Assumptions behind radiometric dating big beautiful women dating alabama

I hope you will take the time to clear up an issue that has arisen in an on-line discussion I am having with a young-earth creationist.

This gentleman seems to presume that the Earth is less than 12,000 years old, and is therefore skeptical of radiometric dating methods, saying: As for any of the “dating” methods – On the form used to submit samples for dating, is a space to indicate how old you “think” the sample should be.

When I first got involved in the creationism/evolution controversy, back in early 1995, I looked around for an article or book that explained radiometric dating in a way that nonscientists could understand. Young-Earth creationists -- that is, creationists who believe that Earth is no more than 10,000 years old -- are fond of attacking radiometric dating methods as being full of inaccuracies and riddled with sources of error.

All these methods point to Earth being very, very old -- several billions of years old.

In the past 150 years, scholars have uncovered a wealth of information regarding the cultural and literary world in which the Genesis narrative was drafted.

The theological implications of these findings have been debated on all sides, and such continues today.

This article is a followup to an exchange I had with “Douglas” in the comments section of my recent posting, The Three Arguments Against Atheism. Berger, Professor of Chemistry at Bluffton University, Ohio.

Many geologists claim that radiometric “clocks” show rocks to be millions of years old.

Radiometric dating methods are the strongest direct evidence that geologists have for the age of the Earth.

When I first became interested in the creation-evolution debate, in late 1994, I looked around for sources that clearly and simply explained what radiometric dating is and why young-Earth creationists are driven to discredit it.

I found several good sources, but none that seemed both complete enough to stand alone and simple enough for a nongeologist to understand them.

Thus this essay, which is my attempt at producing such a source.

Leave a Reply